I installed Windows 7 on my ASUS Atom N270
Before I did that, I recorded how long it took to do a few things:
-Copying a 45 MB file over the network
-Boot Time
-Shutdown Time
-Memory used at idle, after startup
-IE Launch time
Then, after I installed Windows 7, I did the same, and recorded how long it took. I was curious to see if Windows 7 was faster or slower than XP.
Keep in mind this is not scientific, but just a simple test I did on my own computer.
Here is what I found:
Boot time under Windows 7 was 22 seconds faster:
Shutdown time under Windows 7 was 20% faster:
What about the time it takes for Internet Explorer to Launch?
Windows 7 was faster there too:
Amazingly the memory usage at idle was less in Windows 7, than in Windows XP. I should do this article again with Vista. I am sure that number in Vista is over 1GB
Another test I did was copying a 45 MB file over my wireless network.
Look at the difference:
This was an amazing result. I had to try it a few times to make sure it was not a mistake. It took Windows XP almost a minute longer to transfer that same file.
Amazing. Windows 7 is faster on all of my tests. Not only has it won this little test, but instead of wanting to remove it after 2 weeks (Like with Vista)…I want to install it on all of my computers!
Question regarding this article. Was a fresh install of Windows 7 compared against a fresh install of Windows XP? Or did you dual boot the configuration and used a preexisting installation of Windows XP? Reason why I’m asking is if the latter was done, the XP installation may have been laden down with whatever number of years of software etc, so of course a fresh install of 7 would beat out XP. Granted, 7 is far more streamlined than Vista was, so the fact that 7 comes out of the box already pretty slim is great.
Just making sure so that we have equal and accurate results. Thanks!
Yes, these were both fresh installs. The only part I cannot reproduce is that the XP install is from ASUS…which may have its own extra filling.
Still. I did have Vista on this machine…and boy was it painful. With 7…it just seems to snap – even more so than XP
I think, you should compare fresh installations only. Windows gets slower and slower the longer the installation is in use. Your XP installation might be quite old. I’ve tried the Windows 7 RC and it’s not running smoothly on my Athlon XP 2400+. I was really surprised since Ubuntu-Linux runs on the same machine like a charm with full 3D desktop effects enabled.
It may have not been clear from the article, but the XP install was fresh. I did install from the OEM i386 directory that ASUS left on the system. I did this right before my Windows 7 install.
So it did not have a years worth of software, and other stuff…but I will say that it could be slower because of additions ASUS packed into the install.
I should take a copy of XP from MSDN like I did with Windows 7 to get an exact 1 to 1 comparison
Still with all of that said, my perception is that it is faster. I find it just moves more quickly than XP did before. It still surprises me.
I think the most interesting stat is the network file transfer time. Has anyone else seen similar results with file transfers?
I totally agree with Steve. Having installed the Win7 MSDN on a number of netbooks I can see a vast speed increase compared to FRESH installs of XP. The speed increase includes boot/shutdown times and file/network transfers. Indeed, while transferring via a share on a Win2k8 server the transfer was so quick on the Win7 device I was working on I thought the transfer had corrupted….I was wrong!
All in all I am very impressed with the new OS on the N270 chips. As with all OS’s I’m sure many people will find issues with it, however I for one have it installed on most of my personal hardware (leaving out the OSX & Linux boxes of course!) and will be starting to put it in to live testing soon.
Copying files from a Vista/Win7 box to a Win2008 server are supposed to be much faster than with WinXP due to the [currently flawed] SMB2:
http://blogs.technet.com/josebda/archive/2008/11/11/file-server-performance-improvements-with-the-smb2-protocol-in-windows-server-2008.aspx
Thanks for clearing that up!
And yeah, I’ve had good experience with 7 myself. I’ve personally installed Windows 7 on a couple test machines at work and my primary gaming machine and it’s definitely as great as your article says it is. I don’t think ASUS adds TOO much bloat to their XP installation, so I think the numbers are fine. But yeah, good stuff and yet another reason to upgrade out of Vista.
The test results look good will have to ditch XP home on my netbook to upgrade
How ever did not see any benefit on my gaming rig as it was built to run vista not XP
Saw very little gain, admittedly did not run the type of tests listed here, that said, Vista ran better on my old Junk box PC then windows 7, which is running a sempron Processor. Probable Incompatible hard ware is the problem which I think is the catch with all OS’S get the right hard ware and any thing will run properly!
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Justin. Justin said: RT @EverytthingMS- Windows XP vs Windows 7 – Who Won? — http://bit.ly/4tCHwo [...]
Hello
The copying over the WiFi network is really impressive, but I have opposite experience
I am running Win7 on DELL machine, but the copying over the network is very very slow. This is what I observe. When I first start up the machine the very first file I will copy from my network drive is fairly fast, but after that whatever I want to copy picture, music etc…. it will start copying but the speed decreases and the time increases. It is very annoying. Remote Differential Compression(RDC) is not what everybody are saying and me personally, I really don’t know what to think. Vista was same, it this should be solved in this new Win7, before all the raving reviews. If you guys have any solution (accept TerraCopy which I am using now) I will be greatly appreciated. I will try the “windows Copy” function on my new Media Center PC and I will let you know how it behaves on the network.
The new MCE details:
Intel Core2 Quad 2.83GHz
4GB RAM Corsair
Asus motherboard P5Q SE Plus
D-Link DWA-556 wifi adapter
Network drive is ReadyNas Duo.
Version of Win7 6.1.7600
Thank
A few things could have changed. They have pushed some major patches out for flaws in the new file transfer protocol, and in addition you will only see speed improvements if you copy to a newer Vista or Windows 7 system. If you copy over to another XP…I don’t think it will be much faster
Another thing that could slow you down is the wifi driver. It is possible the vendor has not worked all the bugs in their new driver and it is running at a sub par speed
I will be online with the PC next week, I am still tuning some stuff. But I will let you know.
Thank you.
I don’t know where you are getting 115 seconds from. My OEM WITH crapware loads in like 20 seconds. Service Pack 3, Intel Atom on Acer AOA110.
Like I said. It was not scientific. Just sayin…it was my system and those are the numbers.
IE launch time 16.5 second and 12.8 seconds- are you serious? I see why it is called an ‘atom’. Surely that is wrong- a 10 year old P4 will open IE fully operational in less than 2 seconds here…
Yep. These Atom systems are quite slow…but in return you get a small form factor, and low power consumption.